Joan Dao was 20 when her mother was followed to her car after a day of errands. One person grabbed her handbag, kicked her, and ran. The theft itself was over quickly. The consequences lasted for months.
Her mother had been carrying identification, credit cards, cash, and other documents she needed that day. Within roughly half an hour, Dao says, the stolen cards had been maxed out. Replacing what was inside meant dealing with banks, insurance, police, and medical care for her mother’s injuries. More difficult to replace was her sense of security.
Dao watched as her mother, a woman who loved fashion and handbags, changed the way she moved through the world. She tried carrying possessions in pockets that were not designed to secure them and covering bags to make herself appear less attractive to a thief. Dao began wondering whether personal security really had to require that kind of compromise.
That question eventually became Ilesovi, her patented anti-theft handbag company. The product has evolved considerably since Dao’s earliest concepts, but one principle has become increasingly important: good security can be more useful when nobody else knows it is there.
Security Does Not Have to Announce Itself
When Dao began researching the market, she found security-focused bags, but many were designed for travelers, backpackers, or people who were comfortable carrying something that visibly looked protective. That was not her mother.
The distinction changed the design problem. Dao was no longer simply asking how many protective features could fit inside a handbag. She wanted to understand how those features could disappear into something a person would have wanted to carry anyway.
Her early concepts pushed much further into technology. She was studying neuroscience and participating in an engineering student group during a period when wearables were attracting considerable attention. At one point, friends joked that her concept resembled a “bear trap of purses.” Over time, the ideas were narrowed into something intended to function as a normal handbag first.
That discretion has become central to how Dao thinks about security. A conspicuously fortified bag can communicate that the person carrying it has something worth protecting. A fashionable handbag with security incorporated into its construction does not have to make the same announcement.
The Product Could Not Explain Itself
Dao initially made a common founder assumption: if the technology was compelling enough, people would understand why they needed it.
Her science and engineering background reinforced that instinct. She approached Ilesovi by explaining its features and presenting the product as something futuristic. It made sense within the technical circles where the concept had developed. Outside that environment, the message was less effective.
Consumers already knew how to use a handbag. They did not necessarily want another piece of technology that required them to learn new behaviors, think about another device, or add another object to their charging routine.
Dao eventually reversed the hierarchy. Ilesovi was a handbag that happened to contain security technology, rather than a security device that happened to take the form of a handbag.
Accepting that distinction was frustrating. It also taught her to separate her attachment to an idea from the evidence customers were giving her. Dao describes learning to look at feedback almost like scientific data. If people thought something was unattractive, confusing, or too conspicuously secure, wanting a different answer did not change the information.
Privacy Is Part of Product Security
That same restraint shapes Dao’s view of where security products should go next. The ability to collect more information does not automatically mean a company should collect it.
Location illustrates the distinction. Dao sees value in giving a customer access to information that could help protect or recover a possession, but she does not believe her company needs to hold that customer’s location data itself. For her, personal security and personal privacy belong in the same product conversation.
It is an important boundary as more ordinary objects gain sensors, connectivity, and software. A company can make a product smarter while still asking whether each technological capability genuinely serves the person using it.
Ilesovi grew from Dao trying to help her mother feel comfortable carrying a handbag again. Years of prototyping, patent work, manufacturing challenges, and customer feedback have made the problem more sophisticated, but they have not fundamentally changed it. The technology works best when it protects the life someone already wants to live, without requiring that person to look or behave as though danger is always the first thing on her mind.
Want more Plugged In? Read more or listen on Apple Podcasts.
